Secure code review
Some vulnerabilities are far easier to find in the source than from the outside. Our reviewers read your code with your threat model in mind, use static analysis for breadth, and hand back findings tied to exact files and lines with fixes your developers can merge.
What we review
- Authentication, authorization, and session logic
- Injection sinks and unsafe handling of input
- Cryptography and secrets in code and configuration
- Dependencies and supply chain risk
- Infrastructure as code: Terraform, CloudFormation, and Kubernetes manifests
- CI/CD pipelines and build security
- Language-specific pitfalls in Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Go, Java, C#, PHP, and more
How we approach it
We start by learning the architecture and the paths sensitive data takes, then trace those paths through the code by hand. Static analysis and dependency scanning cover the rest, and every tool result is checked by a person before it reaches your report.
What you get
- Findings mapped to file, line, and commit
- Severity ratings with exploitability notes
- Suggested code fixes in your language and framework
- Walkthrough session with your developers
- Re-review of fixes
Typical use cases
- Security-critical code: authentication, payments, and cryptography
- Before a major release or open-sourcing a project
- Due diligence ahead of an acquisition or investment
- Pairing with a pen test for full white-box coverage
Often paired with
Tell us what you need tested.
Send a few details and we'll set up a short scoping call, then follow up with a fixed-fee proposal.